“Funny” becoming on par with “death” or “cessation of effort”?
The site is linked through Huffingtonpost.com– where I receive my news predigested and populist: anyone can participate, anyone can resist copy editing (they often do), and everyone can cull the chaff of the day’s news to find that bright, shiny, nugget of newertainment
BREAKING NEWS: Romney’s house broken into! Bobby Jindal sounds just like Kenneth from 30Rock! Iceland is a land of Vikings and that inscrutable tormentor of swans Bjork!
that the blogosphere can work with– it’s striving, certainly, and its after a certain kind of affect– but the stakes are, even absurdly stated– rather high. To not laugh is to not exist, apparently. A smirk is akin to a pulse, perhaps.
And so the news becomes something to craft, to experience as a sensibility, to strive after a sort of “mythmaking”. As a praxis, it has real political potential, so long as it can be opened up beyond snarkiness and insult.
Myth is invoked as a means of deriving usable values from history, and of putting those values beyond the reach of critical demystification (Slotkin)…
The usable values here are entertainment, clearly–a good laugh is always beyond rationalization– how dreadful to have your jokes explained to you, after all.

Absurd might be

on its way to sublime

